-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 268
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Code formatter #305
Code formatter #305
Conversation
For me this is easier to read, so I'm for the change. |
Maybe it is good to rebase and merge #235 before we merge this. Other PRs don't seem ready to merge. |
I'll rebase |
a29ef7d
to
c6602db
Compare
Looks good to me! @arjan are you ok? |
@seriyps Go ahead and merge. Then we can ask @Maria-12648430 to check her pull request #307 |
Thanks! 🎉 |
Heeey! Don't make me your guinea pig 😅 j/k There are some merge conflicts, as expected. I'll have to look at them more closely later, busy right now 😉 |
Glad this got merged. Thanks. |
Just a proof of concept to start the discussion.
Pros:
Cons:
git blame
will be confusing by default (unless one doesgit config --global blame.ignoreRevsFile .git-blame-ignore-revs
, which is quite common solution)rebar3 fmt
over the fork's source tree). But right now we don't have that many open PRs.